Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH)
1) The antenna is way better on the RAZR - fair better than the III.
(This is the selling point at this point - there is nothing more fustrating then having no signal.)
2) The battery life on the RAZR is far supreme.
(Which is expected as this is the selling point to this phone).
I am being told that nothing can compare to Motorola's antennas - which makes sense as they are big in the communication business. (LE, Fire, etc)
Soooooo - what I am wanting to ask everyone - is the antenna that much better?
Thanks!!!!
Replies
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by CellStudent
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by Jarahawk
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by CellStudent
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by crazyeaglefan236
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by Jarahawk
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by DialUpWifi
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by Gsmith-cellularplusus
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by DialUpWifi
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by Gsmith-cellularplusus
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by DialUpWifi
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by Gsmith-cellularplusus
- Re: Galaxy III vs RAZR MAXX HD (SIGNAL STRENGTH) by DialUpWifi


