DiamondPro said:
Couldnt be worse then the bumbling idiots over at verizon ripping people off.

Sprint also has there decent coverage and best in class Smarphone line up which is more then enough for them to compete against att or verizon.

Hmmmmm...then how do you explain the fact that Verizon and ATT in Q2 of this year added new customers at a rate 10X Sprint's net adds to CDMA (that's pure Sprint CDMA post-paid subscribers, and ignoring everything related to Nextel). In Q2 Sprint CDMA postpaid added 226,000 net subscribers, while in the same period Verizon added 2,200,000 new post-paid subscribers.

If Sprint's handset lineup and CDMA network coverage are equal to or better than Verizon's, what is your explanation for the fact that Verizon is adding new postpaid subscribers at TEN TIMES the rate that Sprint is able to do? Same question applies when comparing Sprint's CDMA net postpaid adds to ATT postpaid adds.

The numbers are all right there to see, and the math is as easy as it gets, the only thing missing is your explanation for why Sprint is showing almost no growth while Verizon & ATT are still growing steadily, and impressively.