It was a very bad 3rd quarter for Sprint, but that was expected.
It is as follows;
Churn; 2.4%
Total 3rd quarter net adds; 233,000
That 233,000 consist of;
A negative on the postpaid of 188,000
Positive 216,000 on prepaid (Boost)
177,000 with MVNO
And 28k with affiliates.
ARPU;
Voice= $61 on postpaid; $32.5 on prepaid
Data;
$7.75 overall but CDMA data ARPU is $10.
On the Power Vision network, there are over 1.5 million customers already on the network.
So the focus seems to be for the quarter is Boost and with Power Vision.
There are key developments that are going to becoming out now and into the future;
New devices, enhance network, enhance Pow...
(continues)
The sad fact is that Alltel and U.S. Cellular will likely add more postpaid numbers and I can't see T-Mobile or Verizon not capitalizing on Sprints downfall. These numbers are horrible, maybe it's the lame commercials and marketing, or the money being thrown into high end Data that isn't paying the bills.
Sprint had better hope for a miracle because they are proving that merging with a non compatible network is dangerous business.
POWER UP!!
Also postpaid is doing well especially with industry leading voice and data ARPU, al though it is at lower margins than the postpaid.
Everyone knew that this will be a bad quarter and will continue for the foreseeable future.
nextel18 said:
Well, at least they are gaining traction with the customers but seem to be not closing. I would rather have them do a good job with postpaid on the voice side, but a great side on the data side, because as well know data will be the future while voice wont.
Also postpaid is doing well especially with industry leading voice and data ARPU, al though it is at lower margins than the postpaid.
Everyone knew that this will be a bad quarter and will continue for the foreseeable future.
OMG!!!!!!!!!! 🤣 Are you really trying to put a positive spin on this, LOL you're hysterical
nextel18 said:
Well, there are positive things about the numbers and report but there are obviously negative ones.
Like....?
If there's anything positive about this is that I've had the laughter of the year after seeing these results.
Sorry, nextel18 but the negative stuff over-out-weights the positive stuff (that you see)
Example; (Positives)
Boost continues to do well yet all of the capacity constraints. Power Vision hits 1.5 million and it is only 1 quarter away from its anniversary and it is only with REV O. The cable joint venture is coming. Wimax announcement. REV A upgrades. Hybrid phones- 4 million of them in distribution channels in midyear or so of 07. New phones coming out next month. Improving the networks on both CDMA and IDEN but aligning the networks to look identical. Still very strong on both voice and ARPU front with both postpaid and prepaid.
bigdaddyjay said:
Yup, boost is rockin and bringin churn results over 6%. How can you be happy about Boost adds when they have such a high churn rate and no guarantee of longevity???
Not to Mention that Boost is putting a huge burden on the tight iDEN network. I am afraid that Sprint is sinking like AT&T Wirless did. Unless the CEO makes some right decisions, they could run the company into the ground in the same way that Zeglis ran ATTWS into the ground.
As voice, starts to diminish on the prepaid side that means the companies need to increase their prepaid exposure by improving those metrics on voice and data APRU as well as postpaid data ARPU. Everyone knows this market for voice is becoming saturated shortly so if you are a data company you should do very well in the future. Check out the situation with the cable companies and telephone ...
(continues)
And could you give me information about the cable partnership? What is the reasoning for the partnership and where do they plan to go with this. I have not read anything about it and am limited in my access of information here at work.
In addition, there have been negatives in the legacy platforms (mainly the IDEN network- the CDMA network has been doing good but still there are declines), although there have been high gross ads; the net ads have not been there to support those numbers. Thus; the bad quarters.
The cable partnership? Sure. This includes; Comcast, Cox communications, Time Warner, and Advance Communications. They will join Sprint to offer advanced services on the EV-DO network with options...
(continues)
Sprint has always tried to be first to market, first to carry the new technology, etc. Look where this has gotten Sprint, people are leaving them!!! Last but not least you continue to spew crap about Q-Chat, newsflash Nextel18-walkie talkie services are where Sprintel is loosing a majority of postpaid!! Maybe your beloved entity should focus on call clarity, lowering dropped calls and building it's network out, not investing in more walkie talkie technology, EVDO-REV/A, Wi Max, and what ever other flavor of the y...
(continues)
Until there is a 60-70% data take rate Voice will rule the roost. It is a cell phone, a device used to make calls, smart companies keep the customer with good credit and great pay history and know they will have revenue comming in. Having a reliance on MVNO and Pre Pay is like gambling in Vegas and Sprint isn't the house so the odds are stacking against them.
When will you learn Nextel18, VOICE pays the bills now and will for some time to come. Verizon, Cingy and T-Mobile see it why doesn't Sprint????
Verizon only has one thing going which is Voice. Cingular has a few things going for them with data and voice. T-mobile has a few things going with are prepaid and voice. So Sprint just focuses on prepaid and data? So what.
As I said 100 times, going into the future I would rather have prepaid and data than postpaid voice.
Watch data arpu and watch voice arpu.
I wouldn't expect 50-60 million people to walk around with Boost and EVDO cards at the same time.
Prepaid is a nice way to add extra revenue into the mix, and will be in the future. However, you can't really build much on top of it.
Ideally, postpaid voice and data complement each other. As voice revenue goes down in time, data revenue needs to pick up the slack. Any company that becomes a leader in both categories will dominate companies that can only succeed at one of the two.
"Watch data arpu and watch voice arpu."
Watch the expenses for each too.
You need to spend to improve- that is the whole point of trying to make that ROIC and other metrics to be at a specific target before entering that market.
Alltel's native netowrk is larger than Sprint's native network.
In the end we will only have Verizon and AT&T (formely Cingular).
lefteyeiu2006 said:
... and AT&T (formely Cingular).
HEY! 😡
😡 😡
Not yet! 😡
- Blaze a trail with rate plans. Matching what the other guys are doing and adding 7pm nights and weekends is not enough. Bring the price points down by $5 or better yet, toss in a couple of hundred extra minutes to make yourself stand out.
- You have the best data network available. Start shouting louder about it.
- Treat your customers like human beings, not crap on the bottom of your shoe. No other major carriers charge you $3 to protect your phone against manufacturer's defect or deal with the manufacturer yourself. THAT'S PISS POOR BUSINESS AND CUSTOMER SERVICE!!!!
- Give your existing customers better deals on phones. They are your best...
(continues)
acdc1a said:
Sprint could stop the bleeding in a few ways. These are some of my suggestions.
- You have the best data network available. Start shouting louder about it.
- Give your existing customers better deals on phones. They are your best form of marketing. Why re-set their eligibility for an upgrade just because they warranty exchanged a phone?
Re: Data
They ARE shouting about it, and everyone here biatches up a storm.
Classic case of "Damned if you do..."
Re: Eligibility
It no longer does affect the eligibility. Reference the many posts on here from early sept. I believe. The rebates are reset now when you BUY a new phone WITH rebate
As to the screaming comment, compare the number of Verizon commercials to the number of Sprint commercials in prime time television. Now compare the ads in the Sunday newspaper. I don't know how you can even think that they are screaming loud enough about it.
But still, the point must be made that the policy HAS changed now, just because it doesnt affect your specific situation isnt a reason to leave it off of the forums for general consumption.
Re: other point
They have focused SO much on data, and people bitch. They say "Voice pays the bills, focus on voice".. then you say they dont focus on data enough.
Like I said.. damned if you do, damned if you dont.
People wont be happy with Sprint (or verizon, or alltell, or tmob, or cingular) unless they're doing what THEY want the company to do.
The cellular industry has some of the most spoiled bratty customers ive ever encountered in my life. You could be a cu...
(continues)
I still want to go back to the voice plans as no one has really commented on them. You can't simply take Cingular and Verizon's plans and throw 7pm nights and weekends on them. One thing you can learn from T-Mobile's success is that people buy based minutes.
T-mo:
$39.99 600 anytime, unlimited n&w starting at 9
Sprint:
$39.99 450 anytime, unlimited n&w starting at 7
People don't ...
(continues)
Did you not notice the use of "I" in the title of the thread?
I knocked Sprint for their pathetic business tactics. Spending $50 billion on a demi-regional carrier with few assets and a far from complimentary (and incompatible) network was an extremely foolish move. It doesn't take a business class to understand that.
I have said this would turn out ugly for Sprint since before the merge, and there has been every indication that I was right. When the third largest wireless carrier in the nation starts bleeding customers, there is undoubtedly something seriously wrong.
Data, prepaid, nothing is going to save Sprint if they don't get their act together an...
(continues)
Duh, everyone already knows that prepaid isn't all that profitable, stop repeating yourself, it just sounds silly. But data on the other hand is very profitable because the infastructure is already there. As Sprint's data profits increase (as they have been) the whole company profits. Stop arguing about voice, that's only a part of the business plan.
As for reading comprehension, shutup.
The sad fact is that Sprint (and Nextel18 himself) are making excuses and emphasizing "data is the future" because that's the only thing they have to bank on. In all reality, voice is going to pay the bills for decades to come. Wimax isn't even going to be a plausible and realistic choice for at least four more years. The only reason Sprint is gunning for a test network by 2008 is because they FCC is requiring them by law to deploy services in the MMS spectrum that they acquired through Nextel. No company is going to depl...
(continues)
Sprint got a heck of a deal. They are over a year ahead of the competition. After the acquisition of Nextel sprint had enough 4g spectrum for a nation wide network. Sprint will have a 4g network nation wide before any other carrier even installs one 4g antenna.
In addition to that Nextel had huge amounts of 1900 mhz spectrum. And exclusive rights to qchat to boot. Qchat is the only commercially viable ptt solution next to iden.
How many billions did tmob, cingular and verizon spend on spectrum in this last action? If you add all three of them up the total 4g spectrum might equal that of sprint. Sprint is transitioning its self to a data only provider. As the...
(continues)
As far as deploying a nationwide 4G network before another company even deploys one 4G antenna...I doubt it. The only reason that Sprint is in such a rush to deploy Wimax test markets is because they are obligated by the FCC to do so by 2008. It was part of the agreement they made to acquire Nextel.
If you aren't aware, Cingular is on a one track road to 4G as well. HSDPA is a 3.5G technology, requiring only a few software upgrades to achieve speeds in the 7.2 Mbit/s per second range. After that, HSUPA software upgrades can boost upload speeds to near parity with download speeds, and MIMO technology will triple and quadruple the speeds that HSDPA/HS...
(continues)
By the way I love how you call hspda a 3.5g technology. It just goes to show how they try to hide what it really is, a 2 bit attempt to catch up to the rest of the wireless industry in north America. Lets see cingular just spent how many billions retro fitting there old tdma network with GSM? And they ju...
(continues)
You love how I call HSDPA 3.5G? I didn't dub HSDPA 3.5G, but that is what it is considered. Do me a favor and type "3.5G HSDPA" into Google search and see the results. The fact is that HSDPA is a 3.5G technology because it upgrades UMTS (the 3G technology) to speeds much faster than competing 3G technologies and much closer to 4G speeds. EDGE is considered to be a 2.5G technology in the same manner. It upgrades 2G GPRS speeds to those much closer to 3G.
Anyway, upgrading to GSM/HSDPA has not been a foolish business move in the slightest for Cingular. GSM technology g...
(continues)
LMAO 🤣
(continues)
(continues)
Am I incorrect in the fact that Sprint showed a good profit?