Home  ›  Carriers  ›

Sprint

Info & Phones News Forum  

all discussions

show all 23 replies

first pic of the sprint motorola Q9c...it's silver!

walker24

Nov 1, 2007, 7:41 PM
enjoy.


http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14 ... »

i think it looks....wow, im speechless..it looks great.
...
walker24

Nov 1, 2007, 7:46 PM
if that doesn't load here is another link:

http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m155/evixor/22.jpg »
...
MissSLM07

Nov 1, 2007, 7:53 PM
Its a nice looking phone but its still a Moto and Im sure that there will be tons of problems with it. 🙄
...
WM6user

Nov 1, 2007, 8:10 PM
Not all Moto's are bad. Samsung is my least favorite.
...
MissSLM07

Nov 2, 2007, 10:31 AM
Well Samsung is okay...they just have a sucky battery life.
...
WM6user

Nov 3, 2007, 11:07 AM
Especially the Blackjack.
...
WM6user

Nov 1, 2007, 8:10 PM
That's sweet!
...
Sprint E-care

Nov 1, 2007, 8:57 PM
I have seen better edit jobs pulled out of my ass the bad pixalation is terrible how can you say thats the real thing and people believe it?
...
walker24

Nov 1, 2007, 10:00 PM
i really think it is the real thing, considering the fingerprint marks and smudges on the screen and the sides.
...
Sprint E-care

Nov 1, 2007, 10:34 PM
the sprint logo is off center and the pixialtion show that the color was poorily changed in a edited program
...
snang

Nov 2, 2007, 3:35 PM
You're a moron. That is all.
...
SprintRep87

Nov 2, 2007, 6:58 PM
The Sprint logo is centered, and even if it wasn't, I sell plenty Sprint phones with off center logo's. Blame poor quality control at the manufacturing level. As far as the pixilation, I would blame it on the jpeg file being saved with compression, which distorts pictures. That or the picture was taken with a low quality camera, most likely a phone camera. Low quality cameras or compressed images will distort areas where colors meet and make them appear jagged or pixilated.

Now, I'm not ruling the possibility of the picture being fraudulent, just saying that in my semi-professional opinion on the matter, it doesn't appear to be a fake.
...
Sprint E-care

Nov 2, 2007, 7:17 PM
when the low quality picture does develop the fuzziness is the distortion not pixals in a brighter color then the phone that look totaslly out of place
...
snang

Nov 2, 2007, 11:57 PM
I bet your favorite movie is Conspiracy Theory eh?
...
ac4321

Nov 1, 2007, 9:17 PM
*crosses fingers that it is only half as bad as the first Q.

Moto would do themselves a favor if they just started designing the outside of phones and overview of functions then let another company make the internals and OS...
😈
...
Sprint E-care

Nov 1, 2007, 9:17 PM
Why does every one accept that picture its an edit job.... did every one loose intellegence all the sudden?
...
ac4321

Nov 1, 2007, 9:24 PM
I don't accept it or not accept it. I'd just prefer nobody *ever* sees that phone. If someone sees me post about the general suckiness of the Q (and every other Sprint Moto...) and decides to avoid it then it is potentially one less dissatisfied customer and one less headache for me.
🤣
...
Sprint E-care

Nov 1, 2007, 9:29 PM
I just hate that stupid people believe thats a real picture is something so wrong the Sprint logo isn't even centered properly
...
HChristianS

Nov 1, 2007, 10:04 PM
actually I see it now. hahaha
...
nikeshoker93

Nov 2, 2007, 1:06 PM
actually,
the keys above it make it look off center, because they are moved over due to the microphone
...
mark038

Nov 3, 2007, 2:16 AM
Amen to that!!

C’ mon another pseudo PDA that won’t fit in your pocket?

What Sprint needs is more mid level to high end handsets..
Sprint need to be the leader it once was; more phones with at least 3 MPixels or 5 if possible (there’s 3 and 5 MPix phones coming from big red and big blue for Christmas)

Blackjack is slimmer than this Motocrap and is already on sale at ATT; when is sprint going to get this version? Next month, next year, maybe the year after, lol!!

Blackberry pearl on sale at VZW; at Sprint…mum is the word (I guess it would be next year too)…
...
walker24

Nov 3, 2007, 2:43 PM
3-5 megs thats what you want...but let me guess, you dont want to pay the price that it cost to get a high end phone, and that goes to everyone. Sure 3-5 megs would be nice but i feel like 2megs is goode enough.

p.s. phones don't make a company, though it is a factor the helps it. 😁
...
mark038

Nov 3, 2007, 6:24 PM
walker24 said:
3-5 megs thats what you want...but let me guess, you dont want to pay the price that it cost to get a high end phone, and that goes to everyone. Sure 3-5 megs would be nice but i feel like 2megs is goode enough.

p.s. phones don't make a company, though it is a factor the helps it. 😁


Is not only me that wants these types of phones (I like taking pics) but is where the market wants or is headed to

Check out that new 5Mpix that SonyEriccson is bringing over here via –rumor is- ATT; sure not many people will fork over the $400 or more (without subsidies) but that’s enough to bring foot traffic to the stores and buy the lesser products.
The Muziq’s and the DLX’s are n...
(continues)
...
walker24

Nov 3, 2007, 7:59 PM
2-che 😁
...

You must log in to reply.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.