Government Wants to Restrict In-Vehicle Communications
not to sure about this
i mean this is a good thing and a bad thing. i think would definitely reduce car accidents. do i think it would reduce it enough for people to notice? No not at all. people are still goin to do it.
...
It's nothing but a bad thing. It's government overstepping once again. What's next? A cell phone scrambling device on every car? Stupid regulations by a stupid government given far too much power.
...
If not, then you have no room to talk. Luckily it was slow in a city residential zone, but still it's the car fix, the insurance dealings, everything. Not a good thing
...
Government Already legislates common sence.
Every single damn law we have is common sence, THINK about it. No drinking and driving? Common sence. No texting and driving? Also common sence.
Please explain the difference to me, and how An anti drinking and driving law is not common sence that is legislated to Protect private citizens.
Every single damn law we have is common sence, THINK about it. No drinking and driving? Common sence. No texting and driving? Also common sence.
Please explain the difference to me, and how An anti drinking and driving law is not common sence that is legislated to Protect private citizens.
...
True, but does the government mandate alcohol containers be made so they can 't be opened while driving? Or cars that automatically adhere to the speed limits?
...
No, its all bad. Its called Big Brother. Government telling you want you can and can't do. Laws already exist to discourage inattentive driving. Obama the Communist on the loose.
...
This forum is closed.
