AT&T and Sprint Tussle About Roaming Rules
Isn't it interesting how the usual Sprint cheerleaders....
How many double negatives are in that sentence? And it's usually this **** starters with no actual grasp on reality(like yourself) that would be considered the "punk".
ATT is the only company in America complaining about this rule. Why? Because they don't want to let rural carriers roam on their small network. Are you cheerleading that?
Sprint is using US Cellular in Oklahoma to enhance its network coverage and somehow ATT is supposed to have a say in that? This is nothing more than retaliation for Sprint being rather successful in helping to block the ATT/Tmobile merger. Which I am actually very happy for because...
They main reason the top 2 are the ones complaining the most, is because they are the ones spending the capital to make Sprints mooching a possibility.
So your response is that the two biggest moochers in history are upset? ATT and Verizon made an entire industry of mooching. they STILL mooch and they arent even complaining about THEMSELVES mooching. They are complaining that Sprint has a roaming agreement with someone. Just so you know, no matter how big ATT/Verizon get it doesn't give them the right to make laws or policies. If the Courts/FCC decide that ATT is correct then I will be happy to say I was wrong. But they won't and we both know it.
That's not true.
I actually may not have cared, but you came at BigRed75 pretty aggressively saying,
"How many double negatives are in that sentence? And it's usually this **** starters with no actual grasp on reality(like yourself) that would be considered the "punk"."
You accused him of "having no actual grasp on reality", when really, you didn't even know you were talking about - even though, it was pretty big news that Verizon filed suit for the same issue AT&T complained about.
Don't put other people down if you don't know the facts yourself.
This forum is closed.