Phone Scoop

printed July 7, 2015
See this page online at:

Home  ›  News  ›

LightSquared Blasts 'Rigged' Tests

Article Comments  

Back to message list

Top message:  "and with an obsolete definition of "harmful interference" by dlmjr   Jan 18, 2012, 2:50 PM

Replying to:  Re: "and with an obsolete definition of "harmful interference" by BigRed75   Jan 18, 2012, 2:54 PM

Re: "and with an obsolete definition of "harmful interference"

by dlmjr    Jan 18, 2012, 3:19 PM

Sprint made a good decision by foregoing the payment due this month.

LS, unless someone bends physics or buys off the FCC, cannot meet the requirement of zero interference.

They were doomed from the get go and thought if they threw enough money and promises around they could skirt the fact that the portion of spectrum involved cannot support high power terrestrial towers blasting out signal without interference with GPS receivers.

Personally, I don't care if Jimmy John's Tom Tom goes blitzo occasionally as it passes a LS tower, but, this involves military and airline navigation systems and anything that has a suspicion of interference should be disallowed.

Anyonw want a Delta flight landing in their back yard?
A cruise missle wandering off course into LA?

Report to moderator


This forum is closed.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram


All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.