AT&T Responds to Justice Department Suit
i agree with ATT !
or how the iphone bog down the att network?
in the long run, as more and more people use cellphone, att network will only get worse if there is no merger!
with merger, you will able to access BOTH att and tmobile towers!
sure, att might raise their price, but you get what you paid for!
if you dont want to pay more, just get Sprint! Sprint gives you unlimited talk, texts and web for 35$ a month!
do you know how many car manufacturers out there?
and Mercedes still able to sell their cars so much more than others?
you get what you paid for!
Either way I see it...T-Mobile is going down. AT&T gets the best benefit from it. The transition for *any* other carrier will be just as bad if not worse, at least AT&T wont have huge, significant changes.
https://www.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.php?fm=m ... »
Please, stop using this car manufacturer argument, you just sound foolish.
----------
mycool said:...netboy said:
do you know how many car manufactures out there?
ALOT!
then why isnt Mercedes selling under cars under 20,000$ ?
of course you pay more if you want better coverage (att + tmobile towers).
but if you dont want to pay more, get virgin mobile! 35$ for unlimited calls, texts, and web !
You're asking the wrong question. What you should be asking is this:
If there were only 2-3 car manufacturers to choose fro
(continues)
Two things:
Because of GSM's designed technology, it has more dropped calls over CDMA. It has very little to do with AT&T and Tmobile operating seperately. A unification of the two, will not change the propagation of how GSM operates or the coverage issues. AT&T would like you to believe it, but in reality, you will lose if you fall prey to this manipulation. If you are in a zone that coverage is better with Tmobile, then that is certainly the fault of AT&T. They most likely have the chance to cover you with spectrum they already have but chose not to.
So this leads to your second opinion.
If "You get what you pay for" and are tired o...
(continues)
why? because i dont like CDMA, i want an even better GSM carrier! 1 plus 1 not equal 2? with merger, i will able to access BOTH att and tmobile towers! so that' better coverage, better carrier! i can buy the latest and hottest unlocked GSM phones in uk, and use it on ATT!
So you are admitting that you are paying more for your carrier but it is not giving you what you pay for? You need better cell service? Interesting. Unlike myself that pays less, yet I seem to utilize everything I pay for; plus more.
Your logic has just become more complex.
John B.
From the above transcript, Netboy does in fact, say he is not getting what he pays for. I made that presumption by how he listed very crucial faults that I do not experience in frequency with my carrier and I pay less. You should have too. So what is inferior about that?
Netboy is paying top dollar for these for a carrier that has issues in the most important aspect of cell service and is willin...
(continues)
But that is not my annoyance.
The premise of this topic is for a merge that will greatly affect the entire population of the wireless industry. Not just his. My intent is to try and convey that individuals like Netboy who have legitimate complaints, should be pushing their carriers to do more with less. This helps keep costs down while creating innovation and enhance a more competitive market and makes a "better carrier". I ...
(continues)
Also, the car analogy doesn't work either. Maybe just stick with the phrase, "you get what you pay for"?
Now don't get me wrong, I am actually pro-merger, but I am simply asking you to stop talking because you are making us look bad...
no they don't. Hell, their employees don't even get this type of plan.
If you are saying Boost offers this, it's still not Sprint. Boost is Pre-Paid. Not Post-Paid. If you are an agent that spills this info out saying Sprint offers this, I hope you get punched in the throat for your stupidity. Just because Sprint owns Boost doesn't mean that they will be offering the same plans, as they clearly don't.
Still, MVNO's are a great alternative to the big 4 right now with all their childish bickering.
B. Employees DEFINITELY get this kind of plan, better even...free ;) While you're talking about spouting misinformation as fact.
This forum is closed.