AT&T Responds to Sprint Lawsuit

---" I agree too, and slammer's "admission" is just as hypocritical as the it claims AT&T is being. the opposite can also be said. One can say that Sprint "wants competition", but isnt that exactly what AT&T is doing?"---

Hypocritical you say?

Sprint is a business. They cast a legitimate bid on Tmobile when no one else was interested. No ATT. No Verizon. No one.Sprint never claimed "It is in the best interest for consumers and we need the spectrum for these consumers" They put a bid in to expand their competitve needs and services. This is exactly what most Sprint opponents(Haters) have been saying Sprint should be doing. I've seen it more times in these forums. Sprint need to this, Sprint needs to do that. Yet, when Sprint does, the Critics don't recognize it?

That's hypocritical.

ATT went after Tmobile only after Sprint bid to keep it out of Sprint's hands. That was the only motive. Once under fire for this merge, inconsistancies start emerging from ATT on technical and ethical direction, spectrum holdings, etc.

That's hypocritical.

I am NOT. I say what I believe and I support what I believe. I don't waver.

If I say I can help you and will help you, I carry through with my commitment and promise. If ATT says they will not raise the price plans(just so they can level Tmobile and control a large portion of the industry), are you willing to trust them? Can you afford it? Will you trust them or will you trust hypocritical me that is a consumer?

John B.