Carriers Want the Gov to Clear All Spectrum Below 3GHz
Umm
Any engineers care to throw their input here? Is the spectrum above 3Ghz worthwhile enough for TV, GPS, Microwaves, Radio, etc?
Heck, do they even use anything below 3Ghz right now?
Heck, do they even use anything below 3Ghz right now?
...
WiMAX can broadcast over 3.5 GHz, as far as I know. Wasnt that specrum used for old style TVs with Bunny-Ears that had dials for UHF and VHF?
...
How is that a good thing? EDGE is fast enough to stream YouTube, for me anyways.
Normal people who arent consumer assholes and make their phone last longer than 8 months use EDGE quite a bit, and like it. My phone is 5 years old and it works as good as the day I bought it, and it uses EDGE quite well.
Normal people who arent consumer assholes and make their phone last longer than 8 months use EDGE quite a bit, and like it. My phone is 5 years old and it works as good as the day I bought it, and it uses EDGE quite well.
...
How cute, an Amish person is happy with Edge.... I think two tin cans and a tight string is Edge capable... 🤣
...
The words you are looking for are buffering loading and sorry this video can't be played due to network issues
...
MadFatMan said:
How cute, an Amish person is happy with Edge.... I think two tin cans and a tight string is Edge capable... 🤣
Not that we NEED anything beyond what we already have--and not that the carriers NEED this spectrum, the greedy bastards.
...
Anything above 3ghz (heck even 2ghz) is a garbage band. It's great for point to point microwave, fixed satellite, short range communications (ie, household) and that's it.
Why? 3+ghz is finicky, reflective, unwilling to transverse obstructions and easily absorbed, line of sight, and difficult to make omnidirectional.
Why? 3+ghz is finicky, reflective, unwilling to transverse obstructions and easily absorbed, line of sight, and difficult to make omnidirectional.
...
This forum is closed.
