San Francisco Gains MetroPCS LTE Coverage
Why?
I understand it is a big city with a large target population, but, citizens there obviously hate cellphone carriers and especially cellphone towers.
murmermer said:
San Francisco HATES cellphone companies, why give them advanced services like LTE?
I understand it is a big city with a large target population, but, citizens there obviously hate cellphone carriers and especially cellphone towers.
Funny you mentioned this. an hour or so North of San Fran especially on the coastal areas, cell towers are hated so much, there isn't any service in some areas. Totally different mentality in that area
murmermer said:
San Francisco HATES cellphone companies, why give them advanced services like LTE?
I understand it is a big city with a large target population, but, citizens there obviously hate cellphone carriers and especially cellphone towers.
It's the same reason Metro had LTE up and running in Las Vegas (CES)--San Fran is a high tech area.
It's a smart business decision.
murmermer said:
San Francisco HATES cellphone companies, why give them advanced services like LTE?
I understand it is a big city with a large target population, but, citizens there obviously hate cellphone carriers and especially cellphone towers.
San Franciscans are most likely concerned about RF emissions (specious) and neighborhood aesthetics (reasonable).
MetroPCS' LTE deployment does not require new cell sites; it is simply an overlay on existing sites.
AJ
Also, when you consider 'Frisco's proximity to Silicon Valley it further explains why they would warrant 4G Coverage ASAP.
DH8
This forum is closed.