Verizon Challenges FCC's Net Neutrality Push
Top message: You just don't get it by crood
Replying to: Re: You just don't get it by trenen
Re: You just don't get it
trenen said:
It's unconstitutional because it directly violates the 5th amendment.
"...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Wireless spectrum is not private property; it is public property. So, your Fifth Amendment argument vis à vis wireless ISPs is null & void.
Additionally, you conveniently use the First Amendment to support your argument against Net Neutrality, yet fail to acknowledge that Net Neutrality helps ensure First Amendment rights to Internet users.
AJ
Replies
- Re: You just don't get it by trenen
- Re: You just don't get it by WiWavelength
- Re: You just don't get it by Slammer
- Re: You just don't get it by tzsm98
- Re: You just don't get it by crammy1
- Re: You just don't get it by Slammer
- Re: You just don't get it by WiWavelength
