Phone Scoop

printed October 8, 2015
See this page online at:

Home  ›  News  ›

3GSM 2006

Intro Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Comments  

all discussions

Samsung i320 vs. Motorola Q Plastics/Build Quality


Feb 16, 2006, 1:02 AM
I noticed that in the i320 article, it was mentioned that the Q felt hollow and cheap. Does it feel hollow in the way of cheap plastics (like the E815), or just simply becasue it is light? How much better are the plastics/build quality on the Samsung?

Thank you! As you can see, I am very concerned about exterior build quality in my handsets. Motorola historically hasn't delivered that, for me.
Rich Brome

Feb 16, 2006, 7:47 AM
I think there's a big difference in favor of the Samsung.

But of course the Q will be EVDO for Verizon. The i320 will be GSM for Europe... so in real life most people won't be able to choose between the two. Sad

Feb 16, 2006, 7:02 PM
Well, Sprint's 2006 roadmap has a Samsung WM 5.0 device with a QWERTY keyboard Very Happy

Let's hope it is a CDMA version of the i320, not the i830Smile

This forum is closed.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.

This forum is closed.

all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram


All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.