Nokia Statement Backs Apple's iPhone Defense
Design Flaw?
Say it ain't so!
I work in a cell phone repair center (Not AT&T, either) and have regularly seen other phones with faulty transceiver (radio), or just really friggan terrible antenna issues.
To list a few including smart and dumb phones:
Motorola RAZR
Motorola Q9c
Sanyo 2700
Sanyo s1
Samsung m300
Samsung m320
Every Palm known to man-****ing-kind (Treo series, Centro, and Pre/Pixi)
Samsung Instinct (Original, S30, and HD)
Blackberry Curve 2
Since life is not perfect, I say we sue to get perfection.
Or better yet, we should have or politicians pass a bill that requires life to be perfect.
🤣 🙄 🤣 🙄
A phone, especially the wireless kind, is going to be prone to lost signal. And I hate the pedestal that the iPhone has been put on (not by Apple, but by people who sound like that YouTube video..."it's not an iPhone, I want an iPhone...") because it's not the jesus phone they worship it to be. It's like any other, with the same defects.
1) Carrier choice - AT&T may simply offer poor reception in your area. Do your research to find out who offers the best reception in your area. There is not a definitive answer to this.
2) Hardware - the iPhone has a verified issue with it's hardware that may cause it's antennas to short out when you bridge the gap on the side of the phone. Purchase one of the many phones that offer better reception on it's respective network than the iPhone 4.
And there's no evidence that the iPhone 4's issue is any different. (That's not to say it's *not* any different, but beyond it being confined to one tiny spot, the attenuation on the iPhone 4 isn't even as severe as say, a Nexus One.)
Proof: http://bit.ly/9g6zPs
That's a 30db drop.
The human body contains salt which is a very good conductor of electric. The body also produces electrical impulses and when connected to an expensive ohm meter, you can actually measure an amount of resistance through your body.
Since the antennas are finely tuned as to transmit and receive for the best possible result, they become very sensitive.Protecting it is essential. Holding a phone around the area of antenna will be effected by the bo...
(continues)
2) There's no crusade, You've shown no evidence that Apple's design is any better or worse as shown in the N1 video. We know the design is susceptible, but apparently so is everything else. That video showed a Nexus One's performance degrading far more than what's been witnessed on an iPhone 4 just by holding it in one's bare hand.
So why do you think Apple is off base?
You are wrong to imply that the iPhone 4's antenna design is any more or less susceptible to attenuation. There's no evidence that even though the antenna is exposed that it suffers more attenuation that other smartphones.
Therefore, you can't call it a design flaw.
(...
(continues)
There is nothing to prove. I strongly urge you to Google Antenna theory. You will be exposed to mathmatic calculations that would better your understanding of how antennas work.
And quit sending me videos and articles of diluted opinionated information from Apple cheerleading Video Jockeys that are looking for handouts from Apple. It is counter-productive to the reality. I am much more intelligent than that. If I want a developer, I will contact you. If I want information on the engineering of life's realities, I will refer to reference books for my source of knowledge. That is how I was instructed in School.
John B.
HelloMotto said:
I am just waiting for the fun to begin when Apple starts pointing the finger at AT&T’s network.
.
u have a great point until
This forum is closed.