AT&T Alters Pricing In Wake of Verizon Announcement
Plans are still non-competitive
ATT doesn't need to compete with them on price until they are competing for the same customers
And with reguards to coverage, I think for the most part people think locally, and regionally, more so than nationally when it comes to coverage.
Menno said:
Tmobile also is half the size and can lose customers at the end of a quarter.
ATT doesn't need to compete with them on price until they are competing for the same customers
You can say this over and over, and they won't understand, fine if TMO works for you, then use them. I prefer AT&T and with a corp. discount, the price difference between the two, makes AT&T a little cheaper.
You go with the company that works the best for you.
But people need to understand that unless Tmobile or Sprint start adding high value (read: Data) customers hand over fist, the other two networks will ignore what they're doing. Voice only customers are not what either company wants.
It's like when they got the "simply everything plan" how many people you think upgraded their plan (paid more money) to have unlimited?
I think sprint needs to stop trying to be the "cheapest" guys on the block and stick with the :most for your money"
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=s&annual »
net income last year (in thousands)
($2,796,000)
But yes. Sprint needs to step up the marketing game. They have made many really impressive improvements. It's time they pursue that avenue.
What I'm saying is that with sprint, instead of pushing how cheap their plans are (which they don't in the "now network" commercials.. a good start) they should push their "map" (coverage), the speed test results, and other recent improvements and basically say: hey! For most people we give you the coverage you need and the speeds you want, we do this for less than our competitors.
This forum is closed.