Verizon Responds to FCC On ETFs and Data Fees
The Carriers should go 1 step further
Example-
A guy that wants to pretend he's got a second house based out of Aspen CO, but really lives in St. Louis pays 2-3 times as much as if he would have gotten his number out of St. Louis.
I completely agree!! Here's why: I would buy a phone in Middle-of-nowhere Nebraska and then sell it in orange county, California. I'd make a killing. I could make up the gas money on like 10 HTC Hero's and put my kids through college with like 100 Ifones.
But what about online pricing? Based on point of sale, shipping or wharehouse.
....again, and I quote; "LOL Freaking A, hahahaha"
murmermer said:
Carrier pricing should be based on the local demographics they are servicing. Hollywood California should have both higher MRC's and phone pricing while Detroit should have lower MRC's because of the lower wages earned. The amount you pay is based on both the address your bill goes to and the address your phone number comes out of.
Example-
A guy that wants to pretend he's got a second house based out of Aspen CO, but really lives in St. Louis pays 2-3 times as much as if he would have gotten his number out of St. Louis.
This has to be one of the stupidest things I've heard on these forums in a while. The whole reason, if you believe Verizon, of raising the ETF rates was to avoid false ...
(continues)
This forum is closed.