San Francisco to Get 7.2Mbps HSDPA from AT&T in 2010
The main reason they should have already done San Fran
CNET.com reviews come from San Francisco bay area. I specifically remember the iphone review where the guy said ATT 3G stopped at the bridge. They blasted att for it, and for lack of backhaul (read lack of bandwidth) to support all the 2000% increase. Reputation from a source means alot. This should have been an immeadiate first priority spot.
If I owned a Nationwide cell phone company (city by priority):
1. New York, Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin
2. DFW, Houston, Miami(area), D.C.
3. Anywhere else
I'm sure with some research I might choose some others but thats off the top of my head.
If I owned a Nationwide cell phone company (city by priority):
1. New York, Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin
2. DFW, Houston, Miami(area), D.C.
3. Anywhere else
I'm sure with some research I might choose some others but thats off the top of my head.
...
This forum is closed.
