AT&T Publishes Public Letter Refuting Verizon Wireless Ads
Just fix the network!
I mean ATT gave VZW the ammo for these attack ads and if as ATT says their 3G is faster, run some commercials proving it.
LTE is going to run into similar problems, it is being built on top of an existing network. Sprints Wimax is built from the ground up.
About the only way GSM is markedly inferior to CDMA is in regards to interference. In terms of latency and reliability it's actually a step above CDMA.
bluecoyote said:
Uh, there's a variety of factors.
About the only way GSM is markedly inferior to CDMA is in regards to interference. In terms of latency and reliability it's actually a step above CDMA.
I prefer CDMA myself, but both systems do have their drawbacks, and pluses.
Most folks I know who have AT&T are happy with them. In spite of all this hoopla, they continue to make money and attract customers.
Let's face it: if you put out an inferior product, you won't survive for long, no matter how "cool" it is. If AT&T's network was really as bad as folks say it is, people would be leaving in droves rather than signing up in.
We've been promised 3G in the Duluth, MN market for quite a long time. After being told by my AT&T rep that they promised 3G on December 31st, they again pushed it back 45 days.
I'm still a bit of a VZW fanboy but now I work for a retailer that offers Verizon, Sprint and AT&T. I try and remain unbias but the VZW 3G network where we're at exists and AT&T keeps postponing.
This forum is closed.