AT&T Sues Verizon for 'Map for That' Ads
Instead of wasting money and suing Verizon
ATT doesn't care about coverage.
They got a hard time about not allowing GV: instead of allowing the service, they sue google.
People poke fun at their (pathetic) coverage, instead of improving it, they sue over WORDING.
They got a hard time about not allowing GV: instead of allowing the service, they sue google.
People poke fun at their (pathetic) coverage, instead of improving it, they sue over WORDING.
...
Menno said:
People poke fun at their (pathetic) coverage, instead of improving it, they sue over WORDING.
AT&T should shoot themselves over their own wording.
All AT&T 3G commercials contain this standard disclaimer: "3G not available in all areas." That literally means "no 3G available anywhere."
AT&T, is "3G not available in all areas" an ironic/poetic phrase intended to account for your remarkably small 3G coverage area? Or do you really not understand proper sentence/phrase modification? Do you really not understand the difference between a universal negative and a particular affirmative proposition?
What you really mean is "3G available in not all areas." Or, better yet, "3G available in...
(continues)
...
This forum is closed.
