Unannounced Samsung Touch Phone Spotted
Yep, Instinct 2
I soon as I saw that picture I know that had to be a new Instinct. Just hope they don't screw this one up like they did the first. Lets hope it uses a different browser. I hope it has a lot more and better features too.
...
The Instinct is bad?
Oh wait, you have the Strom as your pic. Makes sense now.
Anyway, if it weren't for the Pre, I'd be pumped for this.
Oh wait, you have the Strom as your pic. Makes sense now.
Anyway, if it weren't for the Pre, I'd be pumped for this.
...
Did you own the Instinct when it first came out? I did and the browser sucked phone had a bit of problems, took them forver to fix the browser, etc. Read about any old post about the Instinct and you'd see.
It may be a good phone now but whats that matter? More or likely by this summer a new one will be out.
It may be a good phone now but whats that matter? More or likely by this summer a new one will be out.
...
The instinct 2 is such a copier and poser. It changed its look the exact same way the iPhone 3G did. The first iPhone was square. Then the second iPhone was rounded off just like how the instinct 2 copied. Samsungs needs help being orginal
...
ALl of the carriers went after a RAZR-esque phone when ATT released it, because EVERYONE had to have it (ATT with its incredible marketing capability). Sprint had the "blade" and the "katana" (the blade as it turns out was a WAY better phone then the razr...the katana sucked until it's latest iteration, the eclipse) Samsung seemed to be on the forefront of copying the most popular phones for everyone else. I'm not sure what verizon or Tmo did to combat the razr exactly, but they did the same thing when the Iphone came out, and again samsung was at the forefront. Not to say that other companies havn't done the same, LG with the Vu is an iphone copy, the dare, etc...I just think that LG does for big V that samsung does for Sprint, (although th...
(continues)
(continues)
...
ElTriste said:...
ALl of the carriers went after a RAZR-esque phone when ATT released it, because EVERYONE had to have it (ATT with its incredible marketing capability). Sprint had the "blade" and the "katana" (the blade as it turns out was a WAY better phone then the razr...the katana sucked until it's latest iteration, the eclipse) Samsung seemed to be on the forefront of copying the most popular phones for everyone else. I'm not sure what verizon or Tmo did to combat the razr exactly, but they did the same thing when the Iphone came out, and again samsung was at the forefront. Not to say that other companies havn't done the same, LG with the Vu is an iphone copy, the dare, etc...I just think that LG does for big V that sa
(continues)
...
This forum is closed.
