Phone Scoop

printed July 4, 2015
See this page online at:

Home  ›  News  ›

Sprint Asks Obama to Set Up $2 Billion First-Responder Network

Article Comments  

Back to message list

Replying to:  The Reason for Nextel vs others by rockstar323   Jan 16, 2009, 6:22 PM

Re: The Reason for Nextel vs others

by TechBoy2881    Jan 18, 2009, 3:21 PM

I think the biggest reason to go with Nextel as opposed to the others is the 700 MHZ footprint. That wavelength can penetrate into a lot of places that Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile can't. Places like buildings that are on fire, or underneath collapsed structures.

Also, regardless of how calls are made, having the option of your phone also having an alternate 2-way communications system (DirecTalk) built in, without extra handsets or hardware is crucial.

Now, whether this carrier or that carrier was still in service on 9/11 or during Katrina is pretty irrelevant. At one moment or another, every carrier has failed while others were triumphant. The important thing is to look at the whole. With Verizon and AT&T, you have a wide network, 1200+ MHZ spectrum, and PTT that is dependent on data services, which you aren't going to find in many places, and which when networks are stressed, is the first thing to fail. And anyone suggesting T-Mobile should be shot.

The clear answer of what technology should be used in a National Emergency Network is iDen.

Report to moderator


No replies to this message

This forum is closed.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram


All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.