4G Networks Tested: WiMAX vs. HSPA+
Dumb conclusions
By including location F, the overall average was greatly skewed. PS admits there was little 4G coverage in the burbs. The 4G signal there appeared almost non-existent, and for some reason the HSPA was the strongest. Drop location F from the test and WiMax ends up 50% faster on download, although still much slower on upload.
Replies
- Should have said "Flawed conclusions" , sorry. by tbacba
- Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Rich Brome
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Kayslay34
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by mingkee
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Kayslay34
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by mingkee
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by tbacba
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Iknownothing
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Rich Brome
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Chippewas86
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by P-TRIZZ2931
- misleading... how? by Rich Brome
- Re: misleading... how? by Kayslay34
- Re: Sure, you *could* skew the numbers. We didn't. by Kayslay34
- Re: Dumb conclusions by cellphonesaretools
