Home  ›  News  ›

AT&T Scores Pantech's C630

Article Comments  

all discussions

show all 10 replies

Why do they......

Jrockemsockem

Dec 11, 2008, 10:58 AM
Put decent features in such a horrible looking phone?? 😕
...
kewzee

Dec 11, 2008, 12:17 PM
i dont understand it either, i work for at&t and ask myself why there is such a huge love affair between them and pantech. this phone is like an ugly fat woman with a beautiful personality ☚ī¸
...
CFoukas

Dec 11, 2008, 1:27 PM
Wow, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
...
IamTheGodfather

Dec 11, 2008, 1:28 PM
Pantech are just ugly phones by nature, I am very happy my company never sells them because I never seen ONE i even remotely liked/.
...
bojmir

Dec 11, 2008, 1:45 PM
Haha, well done with the Billy Madison reference! I award you points for that.
...
PhonemanJ

Dec 11, 2008, 2:00 PM
The reason for this phone is to move people out of thier old Nokia 6010s into a phone with a few more features.
...
kewzee

Dec 11, 2008, 2:10 PM
if someone has the nokia 6010 RIGHT now theyve been eligible to upgrade for quite some time so im sure they werent waiting for pantech to be their god and savior. theres been plenty of adequate phones thats been out since then so if they still carry that nokia then they must be satisfied by it and dont need gps, music player, 3G, etc. about 90% of 6010 users who still have it probably personally knew wyatt earp as a boy.
...
evrodude

Dec 11, 2008, 2:38 PM
A lot of people still need a phone for what it is -- a phone!
...
PhonemanJ

Dec 11, 2008, 3:58 PM
Exactly! Yet some of them may want the GPS and a semi-decent camera to go along with it. Yet they will not have to spend a lot of money to get it.
...
kewzee

Dec 11, 2008, 5:28 PM
man ive worked here for 3 years and i can count on my hand how many people upgraded from a 6010 or any nokia brick all the sudden are interested in getting GPS and willing to sign up for the unlimited media net in order to prevent usage charges. besides its a pantech, which has ranged from crappy to so/so at best depending on which model. ya theres people who want just a phone and those are the people who go for the free stuff and not spend 70 to 90 bucks (depending on the amount of the rebate) for a phone like this.
...
randysvh

Dec 29, 2008, 5:33 AM
Not surprised you mentioned the 6010 since it just so happens to be what i have and was going to upgrade or consider upgrade to a Pantech c630. The c630 though is not a pretty phone, but than neither was the Nokia 6010. It would be nice to be able to buy a phone that is for the most part focused on being a phone and does that part extremely well. Personally textting is a backward step in the revolution of communications. A camera with 1.3 mega pixels is about 9 mega pixels behind the cameras i do have and the current state of the art, so why bother? If i wanted a music machine i would buy an ipod of some sort. If i need to check my email i will go to my computer and do it the normal way. Like i said a phone that does vocal communicati...
(continues)
...

This forum is closed.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.

This forum is closed.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.