T-Mobile Shows Off Two New Sidekicks
Worth it
What else am i missing
Also the screen is 16 bit?
WEAK!!!!!!!!
What's MUCH more important IMO is the screen resolution.
Just as important is that every single day there are advances in LCD quality that make them look even better - in important areas like contrast ratio and viewing angle that are so much more important in real-world usage than # of colors.
The fact is, by specs, the LX may have the best screen in a US mobile phone to da...
(continues)
I have a Inferno type wallpaper and did notice the difference between my chocolate and my razr and some VERY small differences here and there
I love Sharp LCDs and just now read that the lx screen is an Aquos which i didnt know at the time of my first post.
This changes my perspective quite a bit and now see that it just may be one of the best screens out in the U.S next to the iphone. I also want to see that 3 inch beauty in person tho. I now see the where the 100$ comes in. But besides the screen and the camera flash what else is different
3-inch screen (a whole inch bigger, and already 1230984035 times better than the SK3)
Included MircoSD (not that big, but still...)
Flashing camera
Swivel > Slide. It IS a Sidekick.
To me, not worth an extra 100, but I'd definitely spend an extra 50. Actually, I'd probably spend the 100 on the screen alone .. you can see vast improvement over the SK3 by just looking at the picture provided :p
And why would you doubt Rich? Don't you know that he looks at screens all dang day? Have YOU seen it? Why are there so many doubters/haters on here?
This forum is closed.