RIM Adds 8820 Wi-Fi-Enabled BlackBerry to Lineup
No 3G
2) as stated before 3G is not everywhere while wi-fi you can find locally.
3) if this had 3G & wifi, the curves keyboard and maybe double the battery life it does right now. I would drop 500 on this thing now. You cant beat BB's OS. Id rather buy a couple generations into a phone rather then the first (iphone). Just like a car.
4) I'm a stupid treo 680 user who is upset with the purchase 4 months in and now wants a BB.
Or they could go the route they did, which is add wifi. It's a (relatively) cheap & easy way to increase the capabilities of the Blackberry, and one wonders why Palm hasn't done the same thing.
This device is better off on Tmoble, where they can actually bundle WiFi services as well as UMA into the damn thing.
PEZ said:
Maybe its because ATT 3G sucks.
This device is better off on Tmoble, where they can actually bundle WiFi services as well as UMA into the damn thing.
As sucky it may or maynot be, its light years ahead of TM's!
algorithmplus said:
Personally, I'd take wifi any day over 3G. It's much easier to add apps for wifi than 3g, and wifi doesn't cost nearly what it does for 3g data services.
I would much prefer 3g, no have to worry about is it free or not, am I close enough to get a signal or not?
Versed said:algorithmplus said:
Personally, I'd take wifi any day over 3G. It's much easier to add apps for wifi than 3g, and wifi doesn't cost nearly what it does for 3g data services.
I would much prefer 3g, no have to worry about is it free or not, am I close enough to get a signal or not?
I guess I'm coming from a business perspective where I want to minimize costs, and wifi vs. 3g...well it's much cheaper to have data on your own network than that of a mobile operator.
In terms of coverage, yeah, I would take 3g coverage over wife coverage any day.
This forum is closed.