Handset Lemon Law Passed in Illinois
Article
Comments
‹ all discussions
WHAT YOU FAIL TO REALIZE
First sorry for yelling... but I need you to pay attention to this point as to why the carriers should be held directly responsible for their junk handsets, 1 they have the power to hold the manufactorer responsible to build handsets that adhere to a certain standard, if you think making a consumer deal directly with a manufactorer will get you better quality handsets your sadly mistaken you buy 1 phone the carrier buys thousands so if the carrier has to feel the pinch in dealing with crap handsets they will put the screws to the manufactorer for better phones or they will stop offering that manufactorers phones. 2 if Gm has a problem with the seatbelts in its cars not locking properly they handle the problem themselves they dont make the ow...
(continues)
...
I agree totaly. You have to buy a pre approved and tested phone from the carrier to work on its network so why would you hold the carrier responsible. Im with you on this one. 🙂
...
sorry I mean why wouldnt you hold the carrier responsible.
...
the carriers do go after the manufactuers at times, but it takes alot of malfunctioning handsets for that to happen (*cough*razr*cough*), with the way they make electronic equipment nowadays your bound to have a few thousand that will be defective and thats just normal (it shouldnt be....but nowadays it is wether you like it or not).
...
And what you fail to realize is that wireless companies do have quality asurance when it comes to the headsets they release. just because Motorola or whichever company did a rush job trying to get the equipment to the market and let a shipment of deffective phones get out doesn't make it the carriers fault or responsibility.
...
This forum is closed.
‹ all discussions