Cingular's Two Parents Become One
We are AT&T - You will be assimilated.
I wonder how this will effect prices and technology innovation, since the breakup has been credited with lowering prices and stimulating innovation.
Considering how many of the telecom corporations have continued to make forays into privatizing the net with "fast lanes" and other positions related to development and consumer rights - I think in the long run this will just end up hurting the consumer.
Any wagers on when the next breakup will occur?
Bellsouth and AT&T don't compete with each other anywhere in the US. Bellsouth provides local telephone service in 9 states and AT&T provides local telephone service in a seperate 13 states. Nowhere will the combined company be reducing the amount of competition that already exists.
Other than that, long distance rates have been falling for years since competiton from companies like Comcast and Vonage have surfaced. And as far as wireless goes, nothing will change other than AT&T having complete ownership in the company.
There is simply nothing that Congress can really go on to prevent this from happening. Competition will remain, and prices will continue to fall. As far as innovation goes...AT&T Laboratories...
(continues)
Over the last couple of years, when I've wanted to take the temperature of the Vonage user community, I've often stopped at the Vonage Forum. This is a privately run enterprise, totally independent of Vonage. More than 23,000 people have joined the Forum since it was officially launched three years ago this month.
Anyhow, I have been noticing a growing number of posts in which many Vonage users and Vonage Forum Members have been complaining about the quality of Vonage calls over Comcast broadband connections.
It's interesting that there are relatively few similar complaints about the quality of these Vonage calls over other broadband provider networks. Occasionally you'll read abou...
(continues)
This along with my other examples show a trend by telecoms including At&T to limit competition, consumer choices, and mandate legislation that directly contradicts with consumer uses and rights.
If Comcast is limiting bandwith, that is a shady business practice, and I think its even illegal. However, in their defense, I have Comcast broadband and Vonage and never noticed a problem unless the entire internet has gone down in my apartment building.
RUFF1415 said:
Am I missing the point of what this has to do with any adverse effect a merged AT&T and Bellsouth will have on consumers?
I was thinking the very same thing.
captainplooky said:...
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/index.php?p=938 »
Over the last couple of years, when I've wanted to take the temperature of the Vonage user community, I've often stopped at the Vonage Forum. This is a privately run enterprise, totally independent of Vonage. More than 23,000 people have joined the Forum since it was officially launched three years ago this month.
Anyhow, I have been noticing a growing number of posts in which many Vonage users and Vonage Forum Members have been complaining about the quality of Vonage calls over Comcast broadband connections.
It's interesting that there are relatively few similar complaints about the quality of these Vonage calls over other broadband provider
(continues)
While the company name changes, the tactics do not. I was posting originally to illustrate potential issues, and later highlighted those specific to AT&T.
Initially, I was addressing Ruff's statements about how it's commonplace in the industry and that it would not and do not in general hurt or hamper the consumer.
So far, I have not heard one good thing about Comcast. In fact, I'm used to hearing it called "ComCRAP". I've never dealt with them, but that's what I've heard.
AT&T has been using its considerable checkbook to pay off Congressman to ban cities and towns from setting up their own broadband and wireless networks. The top two recipients of AT&T campaign donations in 2006 have proposed laws to ban or dramatically curtail municipal networks.
That's according to Russel Shaw's blog. Shaw dug into AT&T campaign donations, and found that the top recipient this year is Representative Pete Sessions (R-Texas), and number two is Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada).
Sessions has proposed a law that would outright ban municipal networks. At the heart of his so-called "Preserving Innovation in Telecom Act" is section two, titled, "Pro...
(continues)
Celling_it said:...
Municipal Broadband networks are irresponsible spending of tax payer money. The basic argument used by most municipalities is that this is a way to provide low income families broadband internet access at a lower price. This is BS!!! Internet access is NOT a necessity in life. It is not like giving someone help paying there heating bills int he winter, or providing homes are a reduced cost. Those things are necessities in life. You can get internet access for $8 - $12 per month through companies like net-zero. We do not need to subsidize broadband services for the low income, it is available for free at your local schools and libraries. I hate this notion that internet access is something that we
(continues)
(continues)
People need to farm, mine, or whatever they do away from the large cities. We need them and we have to respect them as people. However, it depends on which tax base the money would be coming from. There are different types of taxes in this country. It's not fair for a person in Florida to pay for internet in Wyoming. If Wyoming wants to use its own taxes to build a broadban municipal network statewide, who are we to complain?
What do you say now? You like monopolies? I apologize in advance for bringing partisan politics into this, but both representatives are Rupublicans who are all for BIG business.
I think the example itself goes to show how as companies get bigger and bigger, it becomes all about ther money and less choice for the consumer!
danbfree said:
Who said anything about subsidizing? Many people in small-towns would LOVE to have a choice to pay their town-ran provider instead of some behemouth monopoly!
What do you say now? You like monopolies? I apologize in advance for bringing partisan politics into this, but both representatives are Rupublicans who are all for BIG business.
I think the example itself goes to show how as companies get bigger and bigger, it becomes all about ther money and less choice for the consumer!
bigger business, or bigger government? which will you choose?
Verizon and SBC/Southwest Bell/Pac Bell/Pacific Telesis/AT&T or whatever they’re called this year has called for an end to “free lunches” on the internet – running out of revenue options (guess that customer service and adding new features, that wasn’t on the table?) and that companies like Google are taking advantage of a “free lunch” on their bandwidth.
So, I guess it’s a two-way street Verizon?
Speaking of streets, how much are you paying to drive on our streets?
Or those “free” right of way poles you string your wires on.
Free lunch ends when yours does, buddy. It’s my street and my property. I don’t have any of your “services” so come and take do...
(continues)
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-5807278.html?tag=nl »
A debate over upgrading U.S. telecommunications laws for the digital era began in earnest Wednesday with a proposal aimed at substantially deregulating broadband, satellite and cell phone services.
Sen. John Ensign, a Nevada Republican, introduced a bill that reopens a national dispute that has been simmering, but not fully engaged, since the 1996 Telecommunications Act was enacted. The drafters of the law did not envision the explosive growth of the Internet, wireless and broadband technologies over the last decade.
Ensign's 72-page measure takes a broadly pro-business approach. It say ...
(continues)
captainplooky said:...
Notice this is the same congressman At&T has been donating large sums of monies to.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-5807278.html?tag=nl »
A debate over upgrading U.S. telecommunications laws for the digital era began in earnest Wednesday with a proposal aimed at substantially deregulating broadband, satellite and cell phone services.
Sen. John Ensign, a Nevada Republican, introduced a bill that reopens a national dispute that has been simmering, but not fully engaged, since the 1996 Telecommunications Act was enacted. The drafters of the law did not envision the explosive growth of the Internet, wireless and broadband technologies over the last decade.
Ensign's 72-page measure takes
(continues)
Hmmm....
Sen. John Ensign
Shaw dug into AT&T campaign donations, and found that the top recipient this year is Representative Pete Sessions (R-Texas), and number two is Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada).
Amazingly enough, he is introducing legislation that benefits AT&T and limits consumer rights. Who would have ever imagine it?
That is how they are related.
captainplooky said:
Do I have to draw a picture?
Hmmm....
Sen. John Ensign
Shaw dug into AT&T campaign donations, and found that the top recipient this year is Representative Pete Sessions (R-Texas), and number two is Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada).
Amazingly enough, he is introducing legislation that benefits AT&T and limits consumer rights. Who would have ever imagine it?
That is how they are related.
Yeahhhhhhhhh. I'm sticking with my initial "what the hell does any of this crap have to deal with the subject at hand" instincts. Sorry.
Broadband providers and e-commerce companies, historic allies on many political fronts, are finding themselves butting heads over federal legislation that could change the way either side does business.
A bill expected early next year in the U.S. House of Representatives, coupled with recent comments made by executives from BellSouth and the newly merged AT&T and SBC Communications, has raised the prospect of a two-tiered Internet in which some services--especially video--would be favored over others.
No broadband provider has proposed to block certain Web sites. But they have said Yahoo, for instance, could pay a fee to have its search site loa...
(continues)
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T on January 31, 2006, accusing the telecom giant of violating the law and the privacy of its customers by collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in its massive and illegal program to wiretap and data-mine Americans' communications.
In December of 2005, the press revealed that the government had instituted a comprehensive and warrantless electronic surveillance program that ignored the careful safeguards set forth by Congress. This surveillance program, purportedly authorized by the President at least as early as 2001 and primarily undertaken by th...
(continues)
Don't you care about your privacy and what companies do with your personal information?
Your post just goes to show how ignorant most Americans are and it's ruining our country!
PALO ALTO, Calif., Feb. 23 — A small group of National Security Agency officials slipped into Silicon Valley on one of the agency's periodic technology shopping expeditions this month.
On the wish list, according to several venture capitalists who met with the officials, were an array of technologies that underlie the fierce debate over the Bush administration's anti-terrorist eavesdropping program: computerized systems that reveal connections between seemingly innocuous and unrelated pieces of information.
The tools they were looking for are new, but their application would fall under the well-established practice of data mining: using mathematical and statisti...
(continues)
While agreeing that data mining has a tremendous power for fighting a new kind of warfare, John Arquilla, a professor of defense analysis at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif., said that intelligence agencies had missed an opportunity by misapplying the technologies.
"In many respects, we're fighting the last intelligence war," Mr. Arquilla said. "We have not pursued data mining in the way we should."
Mr. Arquilla, who was a consultant on Admira...
(continues)
dca said:
...but still... What if you were told that on AT&T's 'Daytona' server (or series of servers) resides phone calls from two years prior to 9/11 of indications of something big between sources in Iraq and somewhere in the continental US???
Oh geeze, don't encourage him.
captainplooky said:...
At the time, Admiral Poindexter, who declined to be interviewed for this article because he said he had knowledge of current classified intelligence activities, argued that his program had achieved a tenfold increase in the speed of the searching databases for foreign threats.
While agreeing that data mining has a tremendous power for fighting a new kind of warfare, John Arquilla, a professor of defense analysis at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif., said that intelligence agencies had missed an opportunity by misapplying the technologies.
"In many respects, we're fighting the last intelligence war," Mr. Arquilla said. "We have not pursued data mining in the way we should."
Mr.
(continues)
It is an animated gif. Basically a series of gif images played over one another to give the appearance of movement.
They are relatively easy to make though if you are interested in making a custom one. A internet search should turn up alot of how-to guides.
This forum is closed.