Sprint Found In Violation of Prism Patents
Am I the only one that bothers to actually read patents?
Sprint violated patent number 8,287,155?
"Method of and device for attracting aquatic life forms using bubble and sound formation in an aquatic environment"?
I knew something was slowing down their network, its underwater battery powered bubble makers. I'll leave the relative stupidity of that patent out of this, but everyone is using this patent number in articles everywhere.
Its obviously not the right one, since the troll's, I mean Plaintiffs other "patent" 8,127,345 is a total BS drown-the-approver-with-seventy-pages-of-high ly-technical-reference for a non-innovative non-unique way of logging into a secured system through a network.
But some companies rolled over and ponied up the extortion money, so now everyone has to, or...
(continues)
"Method of and device for attracting aquatic life forms using bubble and sound formation in an aquatic environment"?
I knew something was slowing down their network, its underwater battery powered bubble makers. I'll leave the relative stupidity of that patent out of this, but everyone is using this patent number in articles everywhere.
Its obviously not the right one, since the troll's, I mean Plaintiffs other "patent" 8,127,345 is a total BS drown-the-approver-with-seventy-pages-of-high ly-technical-reference for a non-innovative non-unique way of logging into a secured system through a network.
But some companies rolled over and ponied up the extortion money, so now everyone has to, or...
(continues)
...
This forum is closed.
