T-Mobile Parent Still Wants To Offload the Uncarrier
And then there were three
If both T-Mobile and Sprint had better networks they wouldn't feel the need to fight a price war. Its pretty simple, T-Mobile and Sprint want you to believe they have better networks but the facts are they don't. Sure, in some cities they are solid but overall they just can't compete with the companies that put their networks first and gave the consumer what they truly wanted, fast but more important, reliable.
B-Sides said:
Verizon and AT&T have convinced people that they have better networks, because they do!
If both T-Mobile and Sprint had better networks they wouldn't feel the need to fight a price war. Its pretty simple, T-Mobile and Sprint want you to believe they have better networks but the facts are they don't. Sure, in some cities they are solid but overall they just can't compete with the companies that put their networks first and gave the consumer what they truly wanted, fast but more important, reliable.
You're arguing against a point that I never made. Every company claims their network is the "best" because that is a subjective term. What AT&T and Verizon have also sold everyone on is the idea th...
(continues)
That episode just reminded me that Sprint's reputation for offering marginally cheaper plans but second rate service goes back a very long time. In the world of telcom 1998 was the freaking stone age. And even in 1998, the 'Sprint is cheaper but it sucks' joke was already a cliche.
This forum is closed.