Phone Scoop

printed July 6, 2015
See this page online at:

Home  ›  News  ›

The Phone You're Paying For But Not Getting

Article Comments  

Back to message list

Top message:  Truth by MadFatMan   Mar 23, 2013, 7:49 PM

Replying to:  Re: Truth by MadFatMan   Mar 25, 2013, 11:32 PM

Re: Truth

by Rich Brome (Moderator)    Mar 26, 2013, 6:07 PM   edited Mar 26, 2013, 6:09 PM

MadFatMan said:
The margin that you deem as the consumer fleecing is necessary operating capital as apart of acceptable operational margin and is figured with the cost and goods and services rendered.

I don't completely agree.

Of course all money a company takes in affects its bottom line. I can't deny that.

But my issue is that the companies try to hide the phone cost (the subsidy) in a way that confuses many consumers. It's possible for savvy consumers to stay completely within the 2-year contract system and not get fleeced. But the ones who get confused get fleeced, and that's not fair. A company's profits shouldn't rely on X percentage of its customers falling for a marketing trick that is blatantly wrong and unfair.

And no, I certainly don't think a company's margins should be set be regulation. But banning deceitful pricing structures that are harmful to consumers does seem quite reasonable to me.

Report to moderator


This forum is closed.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram


All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.