ITC Judge Finds Apple Didn't Violate Samsung Patents
Top message: Domestic Industry Question for Eric. by Slammer
Replying to: Re: Domestic Industry Question for Eric. by srich27
Re: Domestic Industry Question for Eric.
Thanks for responding.
I too, am not aware of any manufacturing by Apple state side. Depending on the patents in question, I'm not sure on the verdict. If none of Samsung's related patents are manufactured in the states, that is certainly a strike against them. However, if Apple's related patents are not as well, I don't see the logic. Apple is a US company with no manufacturing in the homeland. I presume this does not fall under Domestic Industry requirements.
I can only deduce that because Apple is a US company, that this is how it's judged. It appears to be a loophole.
John B.
I too, am not aware of any manufacturing by Apple state side. Depending on the patents in question, I'm not sure on the verdict. If none of Samsung's related patents are manufactured in the states, that is certainly a strike against them. However, if Apple's related patents are not as well, I don't see the logic. Apple is a US company with no manufacturing in the homeland. I presume this does not fall under Domestic Industry requirements.
I can only deduce that because Apple is a US company, that this is how it's judged. It appears to be a loophole.
John B.
Replies
- Re: Domestic Industry Question for Eric. by KOL4420
