Home  ›  News  ›

More Details Emerge About AT&T's NextWave Purchase

Article Comments  

all discussions

show all 7 replies

The rich get richer.....

mikkej2k

Aug 31, 2012, 12:36 PM
Duopoly. Blue and red. Checkmarks and globes.
...
johnhr2

Aug 31, 2012, 3:18 PM
I hope the goverment forces AT&T and Verizon allow equal and complete roaming of their networks TO ALL their compitions. So that all the regional and rural carriers automaticly become national carriers. But NO carriers can not roam IF they have spectrum in a area. Then it would be competion on price no coverage anymore.

I also see the down side to this were AT&T and Verizon stop improving their networks on purpose.
...
Willwise

Aug 31, 2012, 5:37 PM
John,
your idea seems like a fair one on paper, but why shold verizon and att have to foot the bill for the extra network maintence that would be required. Secondly if it came downt to prices and not just coverage than your percived problem would take place without question. isn't it better the way it is now? Customers whom value coverage will pay extra for att and verizon, while customers who stay in a single area will seek the savings of tmobile or sprint. It comes down to consumer value, and what is important to each indvidual.
...
johnhr2

Sep 2, 2012, 11:43 AM
The reason behind this proposal was for rural user who have only one carrier to choose from. There are places that only get AT&T or Verizon. These area people have no choice or competion for a reliable wireless service outside of AT&T or Verizon.
...
Versed

Sep 2, 2012, 5:12 PM
Buying needed spectrum or spectrum to fill in gaps is different then taking over another carrier. Having a fairly well laid out LTE network is a good thing. Can we argue will AT&T and VZW allow others to use it at some reasonable fee, thats a whole other question.
...
dlmjr

Sep 4, 2012, 4:19 PM
Some people do not need nor desire national coverage and are content.

If you want or need national coverage, you should be investing in it by using one of the larger carriers and paying more.

I do not understand why some, (not accusing you) advocate that customers should be able to choose a cheap local carrier and gain national coverage.

Doesn't make sense.

If you take it to it's logical conclusion, everyone leaves ATT, Verison, Sprint Tmob for locals who ride on the forced roaming. Then they have no money to maintain the networks.

ATT and Verison are willing to invest for a broad national network to accomodate their customers, and the money to do so is huge.
Why do locals get to piggy back on what ATT or Verison customer...
(continues)
...
Versed

Sep 4, 2012, 6:08 PM
I see your point and in somewhat in agreement. I don't think smaller carriers should be given a free ride, but need to pay to access the network. Maybe not gauging, but not a free ride or some token fee imposed.
...
dlmjr

Sep 7, 2012, 12:15 PM
Any forced roaming agreement should be structured such that it is as profitable for the carrier as their contracted customers.

Forced roaming takes resources out of play for the people who are actually paying the higher amount to have a national service.
...

This forum is closed.

Please log in to report a message to the moderator.

This forum is closed.


all discussions

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.