Verizon Launches RIM Blackberry 7250
O goody!
thecellavenger said:If you've never used a Blackbery product, then no, we wouldn't expect you to understand their allure.
🙄 So, forgive me for sounding naive, but I've never understood the value of Blackberry products. I mean, yeah, you get your email, but so do gsm phones. Besides that, do they even really do anything? I just don't quite get the point. But hey, it's got a brighter color screen! 😲
"O bye the way" I would never have VERIZON service they rip you off! 😁
Your response was FULL of grammatical and spelling errors. SO maybe you should proofread your responses more carefully in the future!
FrostyTec said:
What sets BlackBerry apart is the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES). If your company has one, you're not just reading mail...you have remote-control of your corporate e-mail, either Lotus Domino/Notes or Microsoft Exchange/Outlook. There's really nothing else like it, and it works so well with so little administration that I don't mind supporting 150 of these gems by myself.
This is very true - also many users find that they prefer the interface and it's sync capabilites with outlook - mainly ,eaning the way things are organized. The BES is the huge thing, though, and the push e-mail is fantastic. I used one of these myself for 3 months and would never have given it up, but my job too...
(continues)
Now, I pose a new question... Before the merger, AT&T was just beginning to release a product dubbed OGO.... Basicaly a messaging-only device that allowed one to check email, instant messaging, and text.... All unlimited for like $15 more a month for any GSM customer. Now I haven't heard anything about it since the Holy Merger, but seeing as the service was so inexpensive, and the devices averaged $250 less than BBs, wouldn't that be a preferable solution? (Assuming that someone picks up the idea and runs with it...) 😕
I use this for work. if your email is
you name@your company name.com.. then the OGO will NOT work.. its only for AOL, Yahoo, etc..
But ONLY blackberry (at least they were the first there may be more companies now) was secure enough to tap into corporate email and send them to your handheld.. that is why they are soo valuable and important. You can "be at your desk" even when your not.
I like it... I guess you have to be an educated.. needed professional to see the use of this.. 🙂
But I suppose I will wager one more question, no doubt at the expense of yet another sharp-tongued ad hominem attack:
If Trix are for kids, why does that rabbit want them so bad? 😛
I like it... I guess you have to be an educated.. needed professional to see the use of this.. 🙂Apparently education and professionalism don't extend to being courteous.
My personal preference is using only a keyboard without having to fumble around for a "wand". Its a lot easier to use with one hand. I think there are pocket PC's that might have adopted this mind set where using a stylus is optional but I cannot confirm that.
The biggest difference in the two competing products are the software. So far, Mi...
(continues)
da_khan said:...
It's usually a matter of preference. Both Pocket PC and Blackberries are rich with features. The hardware for Pocket PC normally get a leg up with the common consumer because of the nice screen and camera's etc. The Blackberry have a much simpler form factor but are very robust in design with many redundant circuits to ensure reliability. Pocket PC are flashier but not as reliable in this respect.
My personal preference is using only a keyboard without having to fumble around for a "wand". Its a lot easier to use with one hand. I think there are pocket PC's that might have adopted this mind set where using a stylus is optional but I cannot confirm that.
The biggest difference in the two competing pro
(continues)
muchdrama said:...da_khan said:
It's usually a matter of preference. Both Pocket PC and Blackberries are rich with features. The hardware for Pocket PC normally get a leg up with the common consumer because of the nice screen and camera's etc. The Blackberry have a much simpler form factor but are very robust in design with many redundant circuits to ensure reliability. Pocket PC are flashier but not as reliable in this respect.
My personal preference is using only a keyboard without having to fumble around for a "wand". Its a lot easier to use with one hand. I think there are pocket PC's that might have adopted this mind set where using a stylus is optional but I cannot confirm that.
The biggest
(continues)
This forum is closed.