Phone Scoop

printed July 4, 2015
See this page online at:

Home  ›  Reviews  ›

Review: Samsung Galaxy S III

Form Basics Extras Wrap-Up Comments  

Back to message list

Top message:  What could have been ( at least in the US)-- by muchdrama   Jun 21, 2012, 9:56 PM

Replying to:  Re: What could have been ( at least in the US)-- by NonBiasedRep   Jun 22, 2012, 2:54 PM

Re: What could have been ( at least in the US)--

by winnt7    Jul 9, 2012, 7:19 PM

Yes, the S4 Krait chip screams. It's in the HTC One S, X, and GSIII. Plus it's on a new process, smaller transistors mean better power efficiancy and less heat.

The only thing is that CPU-intensive, multi-threaded apps will do better with a quad core compared to a dual core.

The mainstream is under the impression that more cores simply mean more speed. No! If the apps you use are not optimised for use on a multi-core device, then the performance will reflect that. Besides, we aren't at the point when our phones can do all the heavy lifting our desktops and laptops are demanded to do, nor where an octo, or 16 core chip is feasable in a phone. The battery life in that would suck, lol. I'll stick to the S4 chip for now.

Report to moderator


No replies to this message

This forum is closed.

Back to message list

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram


All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.