Home › News ›

Verizon Wireless Sued Over V710 Bluetooth Limitations

Article Comments

Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing

by schnozejt Jan 17, 2005, 3:36 PM

They have absolutely no evidence. What are they going to say? Your honor, it's VZWs fault for not realizing that people assume.

People get upset when their lack of knowledge or assumptions slaps 'em in the face. Just realize and be happy that VZW made most people smarter consumers--> next time you read "connects to your pc or pda," you will QUESTION "to do what?" Next time you see a product w/ a special feature you might research that special feature untill you fully understand all of its parameters.

But back to the point, Kirtland & Packard have no evidence; they will get an "A" for effort.

Report to moderator

Replies

Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by petemcroy Jan 17, 2005, 3:41 PM
- Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by schnozejt Jan 17, 2005, 3:44 PM
  - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by docbenway Jan 26, 2005, 9:12 PM
- Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by TheVerizonMan Jan 17, 2005, 3:44 PM
  - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by petemcroy Jan 17, 2005, 3:47 PM
    - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Aarynk Jan 17, 2005, 3:49 PM
      - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by petemcroy Jan 17, 2005, 3:57 PM
    - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by IVIYTH Jan 17, 2005, 3:50 PM
      - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by petemcroy Jan 17, 2005, 3:55 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by schnozejt Jan 17, 2005, 4:00 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by petemcroy Jan 17, 2005, 4:01 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by schnozejt Jan 17, 2005, 4:03 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Aarynk Jan 17, 2005, 4:03 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by BigRob Jan 17, 2005, 5:01 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by TheVerizonMan Jan 17, 2005, 4:00 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Stevo2k4 Jan 17, 2005, 4:21 PM
- Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Aarynk Jan 17, 2005, 3:46 PM
- Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by schnozejt Jan 17, 2005, 3:49 PM
  - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Stevo2k4 Jan 17, 2005, 3:59 PM
    - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Big Daddy Jan 17, 2005, 4:28 PM
      - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Stevo2k4 Jan 17, 2005, 4:34 PM
- Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by muchdrama Jan 17, 2005, 6:56 PM
  - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by phonescoopjunkie Jan 17, 2005, 6:59 PM
    - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by muchdrama Jan 17, 2005, 7:21 PM
      - Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by BigRob Jan 17, 2005, 7:26 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by muchdrama Jan 17, 2005, 10:25 PM
        
        Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by akaszuba Jan 20, 2005, 5:02 PM
- Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by trevor83 Jan 25, 2005, 1:00 PM
You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by sciguy37 Jan 18, 2005, 12:33 AM
- Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by jramossteel Jan 18, 2005, 10:38 AM
- Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by muchdrama Jan 18, 2005, 10:50 AM
  - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by sciguy37 Jan 18, 2005, 12:57 PM
    - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by muchdrama Jan 18, 2005, 1:13 PM
      - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by sciguy37 Jan 18, 2005, 1:32 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by muchdrama Jan 18, 2005, 2:27 PM
      - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by petemcroy Jan 18, 2005, 3:23 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by Stevo2k4 Jan 18, 2005, 3:57 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by Aleq Jan 19, 2005, 1:04 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by Stevo2k4 Jan 19, 2005, 2:18 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by jramossteel Jan 19, 2005, 3:13 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by akaszuba Jan 20, 2005, 5:21 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by SPCSVZWJeff Jan 21, 2005, 4:18 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by Zaniphan Jan 19, 2005, 3:50 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by joachim Jan 19, 2005, 3:58 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by coldsteel Jan 20, 2005, 7:33 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by joachim Jan 21, 2005, 10:30 AM
      - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by staiano Jan 20, 2005, 5:30 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by Zaniphan Jan 20, 2005, 5:57 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by staiano Jan 20, 2005, 6:09 PM
    - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by shadedpain4 Jan 18, 2005, 1:20 PM
      - Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by sciguy37 Jan 18, 2005, 1:35 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by shadedpain4 Jan 18, 2005, 1:39 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by muchdrama Jan 18, 2005, 2:28 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by shadedpain4 Jan 18, 2005, 2:33 PM
        
        Re: You think so..... Time to get elected officals involved. by muchdrama Jan 19, 2005, 9:14 AM
Re: Kirtland & Packard Has Got Nothing by Icyhot Jan 24, 2005, 2:52 AM

This forum is closed.

‹ Back to message list