FCC Approves Samsung CDMA Smartphone
?????
As for what they were thinking, I actually think it's a smart move. If they're only going to offer one version, it really can't have a camera. That's because, like all Windows Mobile devices sold by Verizon, this is aimed at business users, and there are an awful lot of corporations these days that ban camera phones on the office.
Rich
I believe the addition of the camera as an extra electronic component could also affect the way energy radiates from the components themselves, if the shielding is imperfectly designed. The same way radio energy can be conducted into your ear by a wired headset, it can be conducted through the various parts of phone, without proper isolation and shielding.
The housing also affec...
(continues)
http://forums.wirelessadvisor.com/showthread.php?t=4661 »
Rich
The draft user manual is only submitted to the FCC so they can make sure the required warnings and disclaimers are there. The main content is completely irrelevant to FCC approval, and quite often does not reflect the actual product at all.
What was approved by the FCC and appears in all of the other documents is real hardware and much more recent. It is clearly the i640 - no camera.
Although again, that does not mean the i645 does not exist. It just doesn't seem to be part of this approval.
This forum is closed.