Phone Scoop

printed July 31, 2015
See this page online at:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/discuss.php?ff=7740

Home  ›  News  ›

Sprint Announces Successor to iDEN-Based PTT

Article Comments  

This forum is closed.

This forum is closed.

mycool

Mar 16, 2011, 1:58 PM

Hmm... they need to make sure it has 2 things going for it.

1) Low latency on initialization.
2) Low lag between communications.

That's what the old technology offers, so users will expect the same.
mycool said:
1) Low latency on initialization.
2) Low lag between communications.

That's what the old technology offers, so users will expect the same.


Either way they dont have a choice. iDEN will be dead just ...
(continues)
...
maokh

Mar 16, 2011, 8:54 PM

50 years later....

....sprint will probably still be making attempts to replace direct connect with something comparable. I remember when readylink's garbage SIP implementation was touted as the successor, and when that sucked, QChat would be the successor...and when that sucked...ugh...
2013 they're biting the bullet and doing what they should have done a long time ago. It will probably still be better than the garbage Verizon keeps trotting out there. Oh my goodness, when I worked there they were always trotting out a PTT refresh ...
(continues)
...
AndroidRules

Mar 16, 2011, 12:32 PM

A step in the right direction

Hope Sprint doesn't phuck it up
Be positive. I'm sure they will execute this well.
Azeron

Mar 16, 2011, 11:27 PM

Kyocera?

Rolling Eyes

Manomanoman!
muchdrama

Mar 16, 2011, 5:44 PM

Good--

--because QChat is horrible.
I think it's Q-chat but related to 1x advanced not EVDO, or so some of the birds I've been talking to have said.
mobilewiseguy

Mar 16, 2011, 12:04 PM

New tech is allways welcome

 
 
Page  1  of 1

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Twitter Phone Scoop on Facebook Subscribe to Phone Scoop on YouTube Follow on Instagram

 

All content Copyright 2001-2015 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.
2